Re: parallel vacuum comments

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:05 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:05 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 6:29 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  BTW, if we go with that then we should set the correct phase
> > for workers as well?
>
> If we have separate error context for the leader (vacuumlazy.c) and
> workers (vacuumparallel.c), workers don't necessarily need to have the
> phases such as  VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_VACUUM_INDEX and
> VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_INDEX_CLEANUP. They can use PVIndVacStatus in the
> error callback function as the patch does.
>

Okay. One minor point, let's change comments atop vacuum.c considering
the movement of new functions.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.