Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1+5=5dqNS=S1DcEOsMiuWQz3+kMgEL8x-S60irZuAcm7A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:00 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 05:24:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > Hmm, I thought when decode_combined flag is set to false means we will > > display the raw flags set on the tuple without any further > > interpretation. I think that is what is most people in thread > > advocated about. > > Sorry if I created any confusion. When set to false then the raw list > of flags is returned, and that's the default. > I think that is what we have not done in one of the cases pointed by me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: