Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1++Fw11dDTU7jfdhc0BGpdYmh6Q5HcCXM6XJp_hpuJ-Gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
RE: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:49 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:50:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >>>>> Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized > >>>>> before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik) > > > > it seems like the name ought to have some connection to > > synchronization. Perhaps something like "synchronized_standby_slots"? > > IMHO that might be a bit too close to synchronous_standby_names. > Right, but better than the current one. The other possibility could be wait_for_standby_slots. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: