Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL?
| От | Mark Moellering |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA0uU3UXqe7SSEPFWAq42Y6Lj2vg+++30f7LUkEq56rWec4mnw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Where **not** to use PostgreSQL? (Nicolas Grilly <nicolas@gardentechno.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
I wish more people would ask this question, to me, it is the true mark of experience. In general, I think of PostgreSQL as the leading Relational Database. The farther you get away from relational data and relational queries, the more I would say, you should look for other products or solutions. But if you want to store relational data and then run queries over it, then stick with PostgreSQL.
My 2 scents..
Mark
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:28 AM Nicolas Grilly <nicolas@gardentechno.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:12 PM Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com> wrote:Where I did this on the TB scale, we had some sort of ranking but it was not based on ts_rank.On the PB scale systems I work on now, it is distributed, and we don't order in PostgreSQL (or anywhere else, though if someone wants to write to disk and sort, they can do this I guess)Thanks!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: