Re: Replication slots and footguns
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slots and footguns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv7YkgFhO5u6h_kYFEowbFkzyj1h0kdwmCN4Q31gQktpGQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replication slots and footguns (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication slots and footguns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12 March 2014 19:00, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > All: > > I was just reading Michael's explanation of replication slots > (http://michael.otacoo.com/postgresql-2/postgres-9-4-feature-highlight-replication-slots/) > and realized there was something which had completely escaped me in the > pre-commit discussion: > > select pg_drop_replication_slot('slot_1'); > ERROR: 55006: replication slot "slot_1" is already active > LOCATION: ReplicationSlotAcquire, slot.c:339 > > What defines an "active" slot? > > It seems like there's no way for a DBA to drop slots from the master if > it's rapidly running out of disk WAL space without doing a restart, and > there's no way to drop the slot for a replica which the DBA knows is > permanently offline but was connected earlier. Am I missing something? I'm not clear on why would dropping an active replication slot would solve disk space problems related to WAL. I thought it was inactive slots that were the problem in this regard? -- Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: