Re: rc1 or beta4?
| От | Thom Brown |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: rc1 or beta4? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA-aLv7Xe-BdY662c_NLrw+tFDK-j_N8PRaPr-4vpSLXesNmSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: rc1 or beta4? (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: rc1 or beta4?
Re: rc1 or beta4? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 August 2011 16:56, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
On 17/08/11 17:50, Thom Brown wrote:Oh, in the wiki? I don't know, it is a segfault-causing bug, but all I
> On 17 August 2011 16:47, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
>
>> On 17/08/11 15:00, Dave Page wrote:
>>> The current plan (or, the last one I recall) is to push another 9.1
>>> release tomorrow, for Monday release. Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
>>
>> Sorry to butt in, but it would probably be good to include fixes for the
>> two segfault plpython bugs[1] before wrapping up the release.
>>
>
> It's not listed as a beta-blocker yet. I take it that it should?
wanted was to draw some attention in case the people wrapping the
release missed that thread.
It was my understanding that the only things which can prevent a new beta or release candidate are listed on the wiki (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items). There's only one item on the list now, and I think even that has probably been fixed. If it's not on there, I guess it hasn't yet been considered to be something which can block a release. Since it's not even listed as a non-blocker either, I don't think it's been reviewed in this context.
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: