Re: Updated sequence syntax
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updated sequence syntax |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv7Pf3JQK_LC=72oxh-GaBEORfswdVg+ij+uPo9geYKWeQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updated sequence syntax (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 3 July 2011 22:40, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 19:23 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: >> [...] >> I noticed that altering sequences still uses the old ALTER TABLE >> syntax. While that's required for older versions, it's not anymore. >> Attached a patch to use most up-to-date syntax for each version. This >> is based on the previous newline patch having already been applied. >> >> Obviously this won't enable anything to work that didn't previously, >> but just thought it would be nice to use more suitable syntax. >> > > Sure. But there is one big misunderstanding in your patch: OWNED BY and > OWNER TO are quite different beasts. The "OWNER TO" changes the > ownership of the sequence. IOW, a user is affected as owner of the > object. "OWNED BY" creates a link between a sequence and a table's > column. This is automatically done when you use the serial datatype. > It's quite important because it tells PostgreSQL to drop the sequence > when you want to drop the table. > > Anyway, the patch in itself is interesting. I wasn't willing to write > it, but as you gave it to us, I commited it with some changes :) The moment you mentioned there being a distinction between OWNED BY and OWNER to, I immediately knew what you meant. Thanks. :) -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: