Re: chkpass_in should not be volatile
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: chkpass_in should not be volatile |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv75MiNgS-1c0L_NQfBMMigcrubDWbETOXnV2xZm6K1WjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: chkpass_in should not be volatile ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: chkpass_in should not be volatile
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 June 2016 at 15:26, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes:
> ...or at least according to the warning message:
> postgres=# CREATE EXTENSION chkpass ;
> WARNING: type input function chkpass_in should not be volatile
See thread here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACfv%2BpL2oX08SSZSoaHpyC%3DUbfTFmPt4UmVEKJTH7y%3D2QMRCBw%40mail.gmail.com
Given the lack of complaints so far, maybe we could think about redefining
the behavior of chkpass_in. I'm not very sure to what, though.Thom, how did you end up encountering this?
I built the extension and tried to create it. Not really anything other than that.
Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: