Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv7+9WoEH123STuoSpg9GU5QMraqTueTwy5Cg4XbwD3wXQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 September 2014 12:40, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But this gets at another point: the way we're benchmarking this right
> now, we're really conflating the effects of three different things:
>
> 1. Changing the locking regimen around the freelist and clocksweep.
> 2. Adding a bgreclaimer process.
> 3. Raising the number of buffer locking partitions.First of all thanks for committing part-1 of this changes and itseems you are planing to commit part-3 based on results of testswhich Andres is planing to do and for remaining part (part-2), today
Were parts 2 and 3 committed in the end?
Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: