Re: Detach/attach database
| От | Thom Brown |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Detach/attach database |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA-aLv6kpWtQCViwpmZ45mYFZSRCURTGJt48zLkb+4k+YmSvTg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Detach/attach database (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 November 2011 15:07, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:Maybe. You'd need a set separate set for shared catalogs, too. It
> On 14 November 2011 13:32, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> But Tom's point about XIDs and LSNs seems like it kind of puts a
>> bullet through the heart of the whole idea.
>
> What about having database-level XIDs rather than cluster-level? Is that
> remotely feasible?
seems like a heck of a lot of work, though, especially since (IME,
anyway) most people only really one run one database per cluster.
Thought it would be a lot of work. Well one benefit I could potentially see is paving the way for per-database replication. But I'll let this dream go as it's clearly not something to realistically pursue.
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: