Re: Minmax indexes
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minmax indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv6Ly7x_yQ0bny3S7vUoP5So7VcCq3=RENdpP9aAov_Dtw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minmax indexes (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Minmax indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 January 2014 17:53, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Thom Brown wrote: >> On 8 November 2013 20:11, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > Erik Rijkers wrote: >> >> On Thu, September 26, 2013 00:34, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> >> > On Wed, September 25, 2013 22:34, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> [minmax-5.patch] >> >> > >> >> > I have the impression it's not quite working correctly. >> > >> > Here's a version 7 of the patch, which fixes these bugs and adds >> > opclasses for a bunch more types (timestamp, timestamptz, date, time, >> > timetz), courtesy of Martín Marqués. It's also been rebased to apply >> > cleanly on top of today's master branch. >> > >> > I have also added a selectivity function, but I'm not positive that it's >> > very useful yet. >> >> This patch doesn't appear to have been submitted to any Commitfest. >> Is this still a feature undergoing research then? > > It's still a planned feature, but I didn't have time to continue work > for 2014-01. Alles klar. Thanks -- Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: