Re: synchronized snapshots
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: synchronized snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv65=ELSBQevxu-PtQVLuf0ky5f96aNbbU7KXgrEUoOykg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: synchronized snapshots (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: synchronized snapshots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23 October 2011 00:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de> writes: >> [ synchronized snapshots patch ] > > Applied with, um, rather extensive editorialization. > > I'm not convinced that the SSI case is bulletproof yet, but it'll be > easier to test with the code committed. Can I ask why it doesn't return the same snapshot ID each time? Surely it can't change since you can only export the snapshot of a serializable or repeatable read transaction? A "SELECT count(pg_export_snapshot()) FROM generate_series(1,10000000);" would quickly bork the pg_snapshots directory which any user can run. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: