Re: man pages for contrib programs
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: man pages for contrib programs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv61QBSOtv_jTJ3BoPq3AHpn30ROMtfTfS5u2G+QrgcXEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: man pages for contrib programs (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: man pages for contrib programs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11 April 2012 21:29, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On ons, 2012-04-04 at 21:53 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I think it would be useful to split this up into three sections: > >> F.1. Extensions >> F.2. Client Applications >> F.3. Server Applications > >> where the first looks like now and the other two contain the refentry >> pages. > >> We could also consider making two separate appendixes. Maybe that >> would result in a better table of contents. > > I've played around with this a little bit to see how the tables of > contents etc. turn out. I think the best approach is to have two > appendixes > > F. Additional Supplied Extensions > > with one sect1 per extension, like now, and > > G. Additional Supplied Applications > > with two subsections Client and Server Applications, and one refentry > per application. That would end up looking much like the SPI chapter. Could you clarify what you're defining to be a client application and a server application? This could be confusing as we already have sections under Reference called "PostgreSQL Client Applications" and "PostgreSQL Server Applications", visible in the root table of contents. -- Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: