Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv6-Frq=+u8HT1uu9sZR7wP8ozi0mVfjZ119C6cTq3YD=g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition (tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 July 2017 at 13:09, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Steps to reproduce - > > v9.6 > > postgres=# create table t(n int); > CREATE TABLE > postgres=# create table t1(a int); > CREATE TABLE > postgres=# create view ttt1 as SELECT e.n FROM t e NATURAL LEFT JOIN t1 d; > CREATE VIEW > > v10 - > > run pg_upgrade - > > going to fail ,with this error - > > " > pg_restore: creating TABLE "public.t" > pg_restore: creating TABLE "public.t1" > pg_restore: creating VIEW "public.ttt1" > pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC: > pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 187; 1259 16390 VIEW ttt1 > edb > pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: syntax error at > or near ")" > LINE 16: LEFT JOIN "t1" "d"); > ^ > Command was: > -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_type oid > SELECT > pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_pg_type_oid('16392'::pg_catalog.oid); > > > -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_type array oid > SELECT > pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_array_pg_type_oid('16391'::pg_catalog.oid); > > > -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids > SELECT > pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_heap_pg_class_oid('16390'::pg_catalog.oid); > > CREATE VIEW "ttt1" AS > SELECT "e"."n" > FROM ("t" "e" > LEFT JOIN "t1" "d"); > > " > I think -this issue should be there in the older branches as well but not > checked that. I get the same result on 9.2 and 10 in pg_dump output. Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: