Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv5Z=G+zWxaPwJ5X3=6xt0K_HSseA22RpZ3X_cgBBb8=HQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 January 2013 15:29, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
--
Thom
Tom Lane wrote:--no-error perhaps?
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Here is a patch to add an option -I/--idempotent to pg_ctl, the result
> > of which is that pg_ctl doesn't error on start or stop if the server is
> > already running or already stopped.
>
> Idempotent is a ten-dollar word. Can we find something that average
> people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand?
Couldn't that be misconstrued as to suppress any type of error?
I personally can't think of something terse enough to put into a descriptive long-word option that would adequately describe the change in behaviour it provides.
--suppress-error-when-target-status-already-present ... bit too wordy. ;)
Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: