Re: Help with 9.5 feature wiki page
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Help with 9.5 feature wiki page |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv5K10WTRwU9Ra4XogNXZK1b5EAZjm9uX6scP4gs6r_Otw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Help with 9.5 feature wiki page (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 21 May 2015 at 04:07, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Peter Geoghegan > <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote: >> Due to some MediaWiki weirdness, I cannot login to edit it. > > BTW, I wanted to edit the description of UPSERT. It's not true that > the use of a CTE can be considered a workaround. That pattern can > result in a spurious duplicate violation error with concurrent > upserters, and so I'd definitely discourage it. The only workarounds > that are robust involve subtransactions, like the plpgsql example in > the docs, and there is no declarative way to do that. You need to > catch a duplicate violation and retry to get a robust insert-or-update > outcome. I'd still regard it as a workaround, just with concurrency risks. But perhaps it's best to remove any mention of a workaround altogether. -- Thom
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: