Re: man pages for contrib programs
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: man pages for contrib programs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv5=Dh_Wv8hsUwJM4N0=CDbJ1-7B0r5BptY2ig56u5hFeg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | man pages for contrib programs (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: man pages for contrib programs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 April 2012 19:53, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > ... would be really nice to have. Especially pgbench and pg_upgrade for > me, but it would be useful to have man pages for everything. > > Unfortunately, we can't just replace the sect1's in in Appendix F [0] > with refentry's, because the content model of DocBook doesn't allow > that. (You can't have a mixed sequence of sect1 and refentry, only one > or the other.) > > [0] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/contrib.html > > Which leads to a somewhat related point. The current content listing in > Appendix F mixes extensions (backend modules) with client and server > programs. Who can guess which is which here: > > ... > pg_archivecleanup > pgbench > pg_buffercache > pgcrypto > pg_freespacemap > pgrowlocks > pg_standby > pg_stat_statements > ... > > I think it would be useful to split this up into three sections: > > F.1. Extensions > F.2. Client Applications > F.3. Server Applications This is something I raised previously, but it didn't really attract much comment: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-10/msg00781.php +1 to anything that separates these out. Cramming them into one list like we currently have is confusing. -- Thom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: