Re: Feature matrix filter
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature matrix filter |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv4cf8sW1yLzdnfFk+56wV+SdKOtT+boNppzWVWqHpseZg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature matrix filter (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 29 May 2013 22:09, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 29 May 2013 21:16, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >>> Howdy all, >>> >>> Whilst at PGCon I briefly discussed with Stefan the idea of providing >>> a jQuery-powered filtering system for the feature matrix. This is >>> because it's becoming increasingly bloated. >>> >>> Prototype attached. This should have no effect on those who have >>> Javascript disabled. >>> >>> Feedback welcome. >> >> A couple of things spring to mind: >> >> - I think it's more natural to have the checkboxes after the labels, >> not before, e.g. >> >> 8.3 [x] 8.4 [x] 9.0 [x] >> >> (I actually found it quite off-putting having them the other way around). > > I agree as it happens. > >> - By default, perhaps we should only show supported versions and >> betas/alphas, so the grid isn't too big when the user starts. > > Easy enough. > >> - Should we automatically hide obsolete features if they're obsolete >> in all displayed versions? Maybe that should be a checkable option (on >> by default) shown below the list of versions along with "Hide >> unchanged features" > > That should be the case with the "hide unchanged features" checkbox > checked anyway. The rule is, if it's the same value across all > displayed versions (regardless of whether they're all "Yes", "No" or > "Obsolete"), the row becomes hidden. > > Updated version attached. Actually, I guess the "Hide unchanged features" label should be to the left of its control too. (reattached) -- Thom
Вложения
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: