Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv4TeXRse5-vZYRiFvR1f-yHv0rnOCBn3NjU7ePhVYv6UQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1? (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 9 September 2011 19:19, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > On 09/09/2011 08:17 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> Nothing jumps out at me as missing. >>> >>> Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point? >>> >> >> shouldn't we just show supported releases? > > there is a point to that - on the other side the featurematrix is a nice > way to show how steady and strongly we are evolving and innovating. > maybe it would make sense to mark the "supported" releases somehow, like > buy using a different color or a simple "* support release"? I have noticed a mistake I've made. auth_delay, although it's a security feature, shouldn't be under security. It should be listed as contrib/auth_delay under contrib modules. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: