Re: Materialized View Patch File
От | Thom Brown |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized View Patch File |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA-aLv4N9fnU9cv9kr8Z=bnuW7PHTwii6u+GiBj2Lk3ghqqA2g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Materialized View Patch File (Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Materialized View Patch File
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 29 May 2013 10:40, Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Please find the updated patch after fixing some of the issues and comments > given by Ashesh. Just realised this reply has been in my draft folder for over a month... This comment appears to be incomplete: //While editing the view, if it is materialized view then only change The section of if... else if... else if... that begins with: if (name == wxT("autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay")) should probably use: switch(name) { case wxT("autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay") case ... } Given the amount of duplicate functionality this shares with tables, is there not a way there could be a common class they could both inherit from to reduce maintenance overhead? -- Thom
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: