Re: question about memory usage
| От | klo uo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: question about memory usage |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA-8Ld8Q3_40jLR-ZNnxXGyBtgRZiTS2MEkXO_bwVgdRSR47bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: question about memory usage (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: question about memory usage
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Bill, thanks for your reply.
Now that you mention config file, the only thing I did change there, and was suggested to me while I made some on my databases was "max_locks_per_transaction = 50000" (which has default value 10000).
After resetting "max_locks_per_transaction" to default value and restarting the server, memory occupied in working set reduced linearly to around 200 MB.
I guess this is it.On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote:
I'm not an expert on the Windows version, so I could be off-base, but the
POSIX versions of Postgres allocate shared_buffers worth of memory at startup
and lock it for exclusive use by Postgres. Do you have shared_buffers set to
around 1G, perhaps?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: