Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
От | Mariel Cherkassky |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+t6e1m1CFhrqfkkETUnCZyLoJFyRdXvtwUmxji3DoJoskAA5g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hey Jeff,
This example was only used to show that pg96 had better perfomance than pg12 in a very simple case.
In all the tests that I run most of the queries took less time on 9.6`s version. I dont know why, but as you can see after disabling the parameter the simple test that I did showed different results. I intend to test this theory tomorrow. I'm going to disable the parameter and run the same application flows that I have on both machines (9.6 vs 12 with zero value for the param).
I didnt send this mail after doing just one simple test, I have more than 100 queries that work better on 9.6 . If u have any explanation I will be happy to hear.
I'll update tomorrow once I'll have the results..
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: