Re: Possible to create canonicalized range type without being superuser?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul A Jungwirth
Тема Re: Possible to create canonicalized range type without being superuser?
Дата
Msg-id CA+renyXJLzzMLfFyaTFE2w9pEUH4wD_7vXyxaQ0u=9cJsK4wRQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Possible to create canonicalized range type without being superuser?  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Possible to create canonicalized range type without being superuser?
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:28 PM, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> writes:
>> > The problem is this (tried on 9.3 and 9.5):
>>
>> The only other obvious way to deal with this is to allow the canonical
>> function to be defined after the range type is created, and then added to
>> the type via an ALTER TYPE command.
>
> Can the canonical function be definitionally optional but runtime required?

Thanks Tom and David for your help! I actually tried to find something
in ALTER TYPE that would do just that, but of course it's not there.
It seems like an appealing solution though.

With Tom's warning that a shell type would require writing the
function in C, I figured I might as well just package it all up as an
extension, so here it is:

https://github.com/pjungwir/inetrange

Of course it still requires superuser privileges, but as least the C
part is just `make && sudo make install`.

Thanks again!
Paul


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is it possible to use an EVENT TRIGGER to validate a TRIGGER?
Следующее
От: Paul A Jungwirth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Possible to create canonicalized range type without being superuser?