Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables
От | Paul A Jungwirth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+renyWhTKaoOT+5bekN+NO-v-idv4NpGHEncnn7Ke7CgKPOBQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: docs about FKs referencing partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Well, the point I would like to outline is that section 5.11.2 about > declarative partitioning and 5.11.3 about partitioning with > inheritance treat about two separate, independent partitioning > methods. So removing the paragraph from the declarative partitioning > section mentioning foreign keys referencing partitioned tables is > fine, because that's not the case anymore... > [snip] > ... However you are adding a paragraph for something which is > completely unrelated to the issue we are trying to fix. If I were to > add something, I think that I would be more general than what you are > trying here and just mention a link to the previous paragraph about > the caveats of inheritance as they apply to single table members of an > inheritance tree and not a full set: > "Indexes and foreign key constraint apply to single tables and not > their inheritance children, hence they have some <link>caveats</> to > be aware of." That seems reasonable to me. Here is a patch file if that is helpful (minor typo corrected). Yours, Paul
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: