Re: Adding percentile metrics to pg_stat_statements module
От | Igor Calabria |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding percentile metrics to pg_stat_statements module |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+r4MrSa1118vM7BVkhOcY6N7GHwZbj6mPm84-_=dsALFZP31Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding percentile metrics to pg_stat_statements module (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
That's not what I wrote. My point was that we *should* store the digests
themselves, otherwise we just introduce additional errors into the
estimates, because it discards the weights/frequencies.
Sorry. I meant to write "no reason to not store the digests"
Em sex, 1 de nov de 2019 às 11:17, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 11:11:13AM -0300, Igor Calabria wrote:
>Yeah, I agree that there's no reason to store the digests themselves and I
>really liked the idea of it being optional.
That's not what I wrote. My point was that we *should* store the digests
themselves, otherwise we just introduce additional errors into the
estimates, because it discards the weights/frequencies.
>If it turns out that memory consumption on real workloads is small enough,
>it could eventually be turned on by default.
>
Maybe, but it's not just about memory consumption. CPU matters too.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: