Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
От | Dmitry Dolgov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+q6zcV7WcodeSz9U52_mNPe67sZ=Nf7VuFVywAcGrLNZJU0og@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:28 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 20/08/2018 05:13, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Patch v6 of this thread is failing to apply. Could you rebase? > > attached > > Changes in v7 since v6: > > - Added support for ssl_passphrase_command. > > - Test suite needed some adjustment because GnuTLS doesn't appear to > understand the previously used file format for encrypted keys. > > - Removed tls-unique channel binding support. Support for > tls-server-end-point still needs to be added, but it could be a separate > patch. Unfortunately it needs to be rebased one more time, could you do this? Also I'm wondering about this: > I'm moving this patch forward to CF 2018-09, since it's not going to be > ready for -07, and we're still whacking around some channel binding > details, which would potentially interfere with this patch. Were you talking about this one [1]? As far as I see it's not a concern anymore? I'll move it to the next CF. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180712041410.GC7352%40paquier.xyz#84bdb384b9e70f039fb849eed8a45817
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: