Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
От | Dmitry Dolgov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+q6zcUBXb9DP2n8MX6-35pGxvxft2twMxXUdw-OaWgn9LYyfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 19:03, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote: > > > If not properly cataloguing NOT NULL constraints would be fixed, can it > > potentially conflict with the current patch or not? > We already doing same stuff for "alter table attach partition" and in this patch i use exactly this routine. If propercataloguing would conflict with my patch - it would conflict with "attach partition" validation too. > I think proper cataloguing can be implemented without conflict with proposed feature. Yes, indeed, this patch relies on the PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint. Then maybe it makes sense to go with the solution, proposed in this thread, while leaving open the possibility of having "SET NOT NULL NOT VALID"? From the functionality point of view it definitely would be beneficial. Any other opinions?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: