Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
От | Dmitry Dolgov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+q6zcU615Gq1qt1Z2HNHDFFWS5je1DtsuOvAYeHw1XjCOpFHw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:34 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:18:09PM +0100, Daniel Verite wrote: > > There's a batch mode for pgbench in a patch posted in [1], > > with \beginbatch and \endbatch commands, but nothing > > for psql AFAICS. > > psql is more complicated because currently it uses a > > blocking PQexec() call at its core. Craig mentioned psql > > integration in [2] and [3]. > > This patch has been around for some time now, the last version fails to > apply cleanly and in-depth reviews have happened. I am moving that to > the next CF, waiting on its author. Unfortunately, nothing was changed since then, so there is already some amount of unaddressed review feedback. I'll move this patch to "Returned with feedback".
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: