Re: Mixing DictConnection and LoggingConnection
От | Daniele Varrazzo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mixing DictConnection and LoggingConnection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+mi_8bDDOeAXxgM47=E8G0XWkvn331TxBc5XME+AQBXSriMbg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Mixing DictConnection and LoggingConnection (Alexey Luchko <luch@ank-sia.com>) |
Список | psycopg |
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Alexey Luchko <luch@ank-sia.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I was thinking of a connection object fetching dicts and reporting slow > queries. However, the way the connections classes are implemented make me > think its impossible to create MyCursor(DictCursor, LoggingCursor) because > they refer directly to parent class for calling inherited methods, like > _cursor.method(....). > > Am I wrong? Yes, as it is now I think you should subclass DictCursor yourself to add timing. We should probably use super(), but mixin-style inheritance doesn't just happen: the classes should be designed for it and I'm afraid they weren't. I'm not even sure the base C classes are "new style" classes. However, yes, I'm all for it: can you try patching the module so that mixing up different orthogonal subclasses (e.g. logging vs. namedtuple...) works as expected? -- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: