Re: pg_reorg in core?
От | Daniele Varrazzo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_reorg in core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+mi_8YiFosp7ueNOjRvNRz124Yqt4_Od3x4bzd6=eQE_HoToQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_reorg in core? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_reorg in core?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > As proposed by Masahiko, a single organization grouping all the tools (one > repository per tool) would be enough. Please note that github can also host > documentation. Bug tracker would be tool-dedicated in this case. From this PoV, pgFoundry allows your tool to be under http://yourtool.projects.postgresql.org instead of under a more generic namespace: I find it a nice and cozy place in the url space where to put your project. If pgFoundry will be dismissed I hope at least a hosting service for static pages will remain. -- Daniele
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: