Re: Psycopg 2.7.4 released
| От | Daniele Varrazzo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Psycopg 2.7.4 released |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+mi_8YBNcgbguijY=0_RCVQeDi-2Mav8oVL_Yk6uUeDWEVtrw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Psycopg 2.7.4 released (Federico <rotellaro@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Psycopg 2.7.4 released
|
| Список | psycopg |
Sorry, wrong send earlier...
On 8 Feb 2018 7:04 p.m., "Federico" <rotellaro@gmail.com> wrote:
I was just wondering how can I manage this separation in the setup.py (install_requires argument).Currently I list psycopg2>=2.7.3.Shall I follow the pattern and create two different source packages or do you recommend a different approach?
If binary packages work as expected you may just use that as a dependency, so "psycopg2-binary>=2.7.3" should do.
But now it occurs to me that the choice of not releasing a source package under psycopg2-binary was probably wrong: if you update your requirements as above, installation would fail if the user has an old pip version, or a non glibc architecture (e.g. Linux Alpine).
I'll create the missing package tomorrow morning. Once done, if your app is not a multithread program also using the system ssh, depending on binary is enough, I don't see reason for two packages.
Cheers
-- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: