Re: NOTIFY in asynchronous mode
От | Daniele Varrazzo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NOTIFY in asynchronous mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+mi_8Y0VHPNQtApjWjEkkDzqUYiL6a=J-w35uavtOy528h8zQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | NOTIFY in asynchronous mode (Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>) |
Список | psycopg |
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote: > On 04/11/11 21:23, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Tobias Oberstein >> <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote: >> >>> is it possible to use notification (sent via NOTIFY from Postgres) in asynchronous mode? >> >> Yes: you should register the connection's file descriptor in the >> twisted reactor so that you can be notified by the kernel when the >> server sends you a notification. > > Actually... it won't work out of the box. I got a patch from someone > that added NOTIFY support for txpostgres, but it broke some unit tests > and there were a few other minor issues with it and then I kind of > forgot about it. Is it possible to use a naked psycopg connection instead of tx? I mean, not for the regular query-return cycle, but just for sitting idle in the reactor and get a callback called upon notify. -- Daniele
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: