Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGLsNqm=axs-mmzym9bbXMo=CV-F0_7f68jQYXb67kaBSQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 1:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > + Tolerate <literal>EINVAL</literal> and <literal>ENOSYS</literal> > > + error results, where appropriate, for fsync calls (Thomas Munro, > > + James Sewell) > > > Nit-picking: ENOSYS is for sync_file_range, EINVAL is for fsync. > > Yeah, I didn't really think it was worth distinguishing. If there > is some more general term that covers both calls, maybe we should > use that? I would just do s/fsync/fsync and sync_file_range/. And I guess also wrap them in <function>? -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: