Re: Re: Cache relation sizes?
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Cache relation sizes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGLKGNyn16B+EH-ArEan_UujPdNwS78FOfmY3W7gugO+4w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 回复:Re: Cache relation sizes? ("陈佳昕(步真)" <buzhen.cjx@alibaba-inc.com>) |
Ответы |
回复:Re: Re: Cache relation sizes?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 1:31 AM 陈佳昕(步真) <buzhen.cjx@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > I studied your patch these days and found there might be a problem. > When execute 'drop database', the smgr shared pool will not be removed because of no call 'smgr_drop_sr'. Function 'dropdb'in dbcommands.c remove the buffer from bufferpool and unlink the real files by 'rmtree', It doesn't call smgrdounlinkall,so the smgr shared cache will not be dropped although the table has been removed. This will cause some errorswhen smgr_alloc_str -> smgropen、smgrimmedsync. Table file has been removed, so smgropen and smgrimmedsync will geta unexpected result. Hi Buzhen, Thanks, you're right -- it needs to scan the pool of SRs and forget everything from the database you're dropping.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: