Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message)
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGL1zcQj0VM_-uxNUOTFv7W0LNjvaV13cYTFSTS_6xH4qg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message)
Re: cfbot wrangling (was Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:19:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> 2. You are attaching some random files, and would like to not > >> displace the cfbot's idea of the latest patchset. > > > I'm assuming that someone wanting to send an additional patch to be applied on > > top of the OP patchset is part of 2? > > AFAIK, if you're submitting a patch then you have to attach a complete > patchset, or the cfbot will be totally lost. Getting the bot to > understand incremental patches would be useful for sure ... but it's > outside the scope of what I'm asking for now, which is just clear > documentation of what the bot can do already. By way of documentation, I've just now tried to answer these question in the new FAQ at: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Cfbot
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: