Re: Windows default locale vs initdb
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows default locale vs initdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGKziSwNmeO3Bt2eVxWHssFMi0KWDurtTbaq6pU+M+HVVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows default locale vs initdb (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows default locale vs initdb
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:33 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:59 PM Juan José Santamaría Flecha > <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com> wrote: > > TL;DR; What I want to show through this example is that Windows ACP is not modified by setlocale(), it can only be donethrough the Windows registry and only in recent releases. > > Thanks, that was helpful, and so was that SO link. > > So it sounds like I should forget about the v3-0002 patch, but the > v3-0001 and v3-0003 patches might have a future. And it sounds like > we might need to investigate maybe defending ourselves against the ACP > being different than what we expect (ie not matching the database > encoding)? Did I understand correctly that you're looking into that? I'm going to withdraw this entry. The sooner we get something like 0001 into a release, the sooner the world will be rid of PostgreSQL clusters initialised with the bad old locale names that the manual very clearly tells you not to use for databases.... but I don't understand this ACP/registry vs database encoding stuff and how it relates to the use of BCP47 locale names, which puts me off changing anything until we do.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: