Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGKmkKfH1h9XG5ctYCgqeOHGdN5bHMoQMZLR=+kLY0PQzA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:29 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 3/18/21 1:54 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > > I'm now looking at Horiguchi-san and Heikki's patch[2] to remove > > XLogReader's callbacks, to try to understand how these two patch sets > > are related. I don't really like the way those callbacks work, and > > I'm afraid had to make them more complicated. But I don't yet know > > very much about that other patch set. More soon. > > OK. Do you think we should get both of those patches in, or do we need > to commit them in a particular order? Or what is your concern? I would like to commit the callback-removal patch first, and then the WAL decoder and prefetcher patches become simpler and cleaner on top of that. I will post the rebase and explanation shortly.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: