Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGKmGm6nT2_d=_MeqJe81tkNgzy_suXQc=GFdHuQt+XecA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 6:58 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... Perhaps something like 0004, which also shows the sort
> of thing that we might consider back-patching to 14 and 15 (next
> revision I'll move that up the front and put it in back-patchable
> form).

I think this is the minimal back-patchable change.  I propose to go
ahead and do that, and then to kick the ideas about latch API changes
into a new thread for the next commitfest.
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Regina Obe"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts
Следующее
От: Runqi Tian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs