Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGKj6sSu7+a_u4S7uHV_4aFiN5Es+mz1jn0nYFZErX71qA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:22 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Rebase after pg_indent. Besides, off the list there was a suggestion that this > > > >> could be useful to accept more than one data type as a key for subscripting. > > > >> E.g. for jsonb it probably makes sense to understand both a simple key name and > > > >> jsonpath: > > > > And one more rebase. > > Oh, looks like I was just confused and it wasn't necessary - for some reason > starting from v22 cfbot tries to apply v6 instead of the latest one. Hi Dmitry, Sorry about that. It looks like I broke the cfbot code that picks which thread to pull patches from when there are several registered in the CF app, the last time the HTML format changed. Now it's back to picking whichever thread has the most recent message on it. Such are the joys of web scraping (obviously we need better integration and that will happen, I just haven't had time yet). Anyway, I fixed that. But now you really do need to rebase :-) -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: