Re: Add support for AT LOCAL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGKdDBrh4PnW6Bw67wUmVHVzJMKH-3rK25NJg9nD9vUndg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Add support for AT LOCAL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Add support for AT LOCAL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hmm, I guess I must have missed some important flag or environment
variable when trying to reproduce it, sorry.

Given that IBM describes xlc as "legacy" (replaced by xlclang, but
still supported for some unspecified period of time for the benefit of
people who need C++ ABI compatibility with old code), I wonder how
long we plan to support it...  Anecdotally, from a time 1-2 decades
ago when I used AIX daily, I can report that vast amounts of open
source stuff couldn't build with xlc, so gcc was used for pretty much
anything that didn't have a C++ ABI requirement.  I kinda wonder if a
single person in the entire world appreciates that we support this.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL