Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGKReczOCzaL8J2aGv2YBOLDGJaLpF1wVmhtpFp6QmQagg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:20 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > Interestingly, a new problem just showed up on the the RHEL9 s390x > machine "lora", where a previously reported problem [1] apparently > re-appeared. It complains about incompatible layout, previously > blamed on mismatch between clang and LLVM versions. I can see that > its clang is v15 from clues in the conflig log, but I don't know which > version of LLVM is being used. However, I see now that --with-llvm > was literally just turned on, so there is no reason to think that this > would have worked before or this work is relevant. Strange though -- > we must be able to JIT further than that on s390x because we have > crash reports in other threads (ie we made it past this and into other > more advanced brokenness). I see that Mark has also just enabled --with-llvm on some POWER Linux animals, and they have failed in various ways. The failures are strangely lacking in detail. It seems we didn't have coverage before, and I recall that there were definitely versions of LLVM that *didn't* work for our usage in the past, which I'll need to dredge out of the archives. I will try to get onto a cfarm POWER machine and see if I can reproduce that, before and after these commits, and whose bug is it etc. I doubt I can get anywhere near an s390x though, and we definitely had pre-existing problems on that arch.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: