Re: A test for replay of regression tests
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGKDsx=kpVqj_s5QcYgGtrNqci75e5cp-C4b8z52VoEaPQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A test for replay of regression tests (Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A test for replay of regression tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:30 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:10:23PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > > This adds 2 whole minutes to the recovery check, when running with the > > Windows serial-only scripts on Cirrus CI (using Andres's CI patches). > > For Linux it adds ~20 seconds to the total of -j8 check-world. > > Hopefully that's time well spent, because it adds test coverage for > > all the redo routines, and hopefully soon we won't have to run 'em in > > series on Windows. > > Should 027-stream-regress be renamed to something that starts earlier ? > Off-list earlier this year, Andres referred to 000. Do you have any data on improved times from doing that? I have wondered about moving it into 001_stream_rep.pl.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: