On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:31 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> We already know that increasing the number of CLOG buffers above the
> current number hurts as the linear search begins to dominate
> (according to the commit message for 5364b357), and it doesn't seem
> great to ship a new feature that melts your CPU when you turn it up.
> Perhaps, to ship this, we need to introduce a buffer mapping table? I
> have attached a "one coffee" attempt at that, on top of your v10 patch
> (unmodified), for discussion. It survives basic testing but I don't
> know how it performs.
Hrrr... Cfbot showed an assertion failure. Here's the two coffee
version with a couple of silly mistakes fixed.