Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout (unreproducible)
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout (unreproducible) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJf5uPTPz-9FoxnaOfeu74Hi494HG8EyVAmPUatPjPL9A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout(unreproducible) (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:13 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 03:03:47PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:05 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > 2019-12-07 01:35:56 | 11025 | postgres | canceling statement due to statement timeout | CLUSTER pg_stat_database_snap USI > > > 2019-12-07 01:35:56 | 11025 | postgres | temporary file: path "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp11025.0.sharedfileset/2.0",size 5455872 | CLUSTER pg_stat_database_snap USI > > > > Hmm. But then... maybe the two log lines you quoted should > > be the other way around for that. > > And, it's actually the other way around, when I order BY something better than > left(log_time::text,19). Hah. Ok, so it looks like we shouldn't be relying on the same code path for 'happy' and 'error' cleanup. This could probably be fixed with a well placed explicit call to SharedFileSetDeleteAll() or a new function SharedFileSetDestroy(), and perhaps a flag in shmem to say it's been done so the callback doesn't do it again needlessly. I don't think this problem is specific to parallel index creation.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: