Re: Failures in constraints regression test, "read only 0 of 8192 bytes"
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Failures in constraints regression test, "read only 0 of 8192 bytes" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJU1hb2jZQWEDniUEU2E1sz_8gUhccg7+Uj0kzBeSCPJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Failures in constraints regression test, "read only 0 of 8192 bytes" (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Failures in constraints regression test, "read only 0 of 8192 bytes"
Re: Failures in constraints regression test, "read only 0 of 8192 bytes" |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:30 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > Barring objections, I'll commit the attached. +1 I guess the comment for smgrreleaseall() could also be updated. It mentions only PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE, but I think sinval overflow (InvalidateSystemCaches()) should also be mentioned? > Hmm, I'm not sure if we need even smgrreleaseall() here anymore. It's > not required for correctness AFAICS. We don't do it in single-rel > invalidation in RelationCacheInvalidateEntry() either. I think we do, because we have missed sinval messages. It's unlikely but a relfilenode might have been recycled, and we might have file descriptors that point to the unlinked files. That is, there are new files with the same names and we need to open those ones.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: