Re: PGSQL 11.4: shared_buffers and /dev/shm size
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGSQL 11.4: shared_buffers and /dev/shm size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJOj7qzDLxeFPVvto8YEWop6FSQoTYPO9Z6Ee=i-nPS_Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGSQL 11.4: shared_buffers and /dev/shm size (Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGSQL 11.4: shared_buffers and /dev/shm size
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:15 PM Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote: > * Konstantin Malanchev <hombit@gmail.com> [2019-07-09 12:10]: > > I have 8 GB RAM and /dev/shm size is 4GB, and there is no significant memory usage by other system processes. I surprisedthat Postgres uses more space in /dev/shm than sharred_buffers parameter allows, probably I don't understand whatthis parameter means. > > > > I have no opportunity to enlarge total RAM and probably this query requires too much RAM to execute. Should Postgresjust use HDD as temporary storage in this case? > > That I cannot know. I know that /dev/shm could > grow as much as available free RAM. Hi, PostgreSQL creates segments in /dev/shm for parallel queries (via shm_open()), not for shared buffers. The amount used is controlled by work_mem. Queries can use up to work_mem for each node you see in the EXPLAIN plan, and for each process, so it can be quite a lot if you have lots of parallel worker processes and/or lots of tables/partitions being sorted or hashed in your query. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: