Re: stress test for parallel workers
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJNS6gZ=w=+wxjqhmck-voJ7FBuejHnw8mQgAp2yt0A9g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: stress test for parallel workers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: stress test for parallel workers
Re: stress test for parallel workers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > > I wondered if the build farm should try to report OOM kill -9 or other > > signal activity affecting the postmaster. > > Yeah, I've been wondering whether pg_ctl could fork off a subprocess > that would fork the postmaster, wait for the postmaster to exit, and then > report the exit status. Where to report it *to* seems like the hard part, > but maybe an answer that worked for the buildfarm would be enough for now. Oh, right, you don't even need subreaper tricks (I was imagining we had a double fork somewhere we don't). Another question is whether the build farm should be setting the Linux oom score adjust thing. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: