Re: Corruption during WAL replay
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Corruption during WAL replay |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJHLF+AjiNZYFaRtKW9SuU39Ld=htP5fX-VCYTeQWc3zA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Corruption during WAL replay (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:35 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > So I'm not sure how much can be gleaned from raw "failure counts" without > taking the number of runs into account as well? Ah, right, it does indeed hold the record for most runs in 3 months, and taking runs into account its "stats" failure rate is clustered with mandrill and seawasp. Anyway, clearly not relevant because dragonet doesn't even show up in the list. animal | runs | stats_test_fail_fraction ---------------+------+-------------------------- mandrill | 158 | 0.0126582278481013 seawasp | 85 | 0.0117647058823529 serinus | 1299 | 0.0107775211701309 sungazer | 174 | 0.00574712643678161 flaviventris | 1292 | 0.00464396284829721 bonito | 313 | 0.00319488817891374 crake | 743 | 0.00134589502018843
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: