Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJEnmapE7YYEfdJYZ-yGmcDpVGRrQ_eEVdcux26ZNJq_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yeah. Well, what say we leave the "typedef unsigned char bool" > pathway in place, but set things up to use that only if sizeof > the stdbool type isn't 1 --- and then it's up to any hypothetical > users of that pathway to choose a compiler and compiler options > that won't choke on it. It sounds like we should stop using the old and broken AC_CHECK_HEADER_STDBOOL macro. I think it was doing two jobs in old times: there were some systems that shipped a defective/pre-standard stdbool.h, and some systems without it. I think both classes of system are gone from the universe. Later autoconf versions check for C99 "or later", but we're stuck with the old one and I doubt we are going to upgrade it. Found in their NEWS: *** AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, AC_CHECK_HEADER_STDBOOL are obsolescent and less picky. These macros are now obsolescent, as programs can simply include stdbool.h unconditionally. If you use these macros, they now accept a stdbool.h that exists but does nothing, so long as ‘bool’, ‘true’, and ‘false’ work anyway. This is for compatibility with C 2023 and with C++.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: