Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJBe0qModjjwWD07N61DYr49bAWxNusnJKX-2FqtSWe9Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Adding a test for speculative insert abort case (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:16 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > s1: insert into t1 values(1, 'someval') on conflict(id) do update set val = 'someotherval'; > s1: pause in ExecInsert before calling ExecInsertIndexTuples > s2: insert into t1 values(1, 'someval'); > s2: continue > > We don't know of a way to add this scenario to the current isolation framework. > > Can anyone think of a good way to put this codepath under test? Hi Melanie, I think it'd be nice to have a set of macros that can create wait points in the C code that isolation tests can control, in a special build. Perhaps there could be shm hash table of named wait points in shared memory; if DEBUG_WAIT_POINT("foo") finds that "foo" is not present, it continues, but if it finds an entry it waits for it to go away. Then isolation tests could add/remove names and signal a condition variable to release waiters. I contemplated that while working on SKIP LOCKED, which had a bunch of weird edge cases that I tested by inserting throw-away wait-point code like this: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CADLWmXXss83oiYD0pn_SfQfg%2ByNEpPbPvgDb8w6Fh--jScSybA%40mail.gmail.com -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: